From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 20 19:02:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC2916A40F; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:02:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20E943D72; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:02:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F421A4D91; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A1040514A3; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:02:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:02:53 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Simon L. Nielsen" Message-ID: <20060920190253.GA83605@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060920104047.GA49442@splork.wirewater.yow> <20060920185542.GE1075@zaphod.nitro.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060920185542.GE1075@zaphod.nitro.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Party X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:02:55 -0000 --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 08:55:43PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2006.09.20 10:40:47 +0000, Jacula Modyun wrote: > > Today do the spammers and viruses give a party in th FreeBsd mailing li= sts? > > Here it is raining cats and dogs from spammers. >=20 > Yes, unfortunately the spam filter program decided to kill itself and > had to be manually restarted, so only the basic first level filter, > which is run on the incoming mail server, was active for a while. >=20 > BTW. thanks for sending your mail to the proper list for such things > so we don't add more noise to the normal lists talking about the spam > compared to the actual spam mails. BTW, those of you who were bothered by the increase in spam should look at setting up bogofilter; it handled the extra spam load transparently and none of them got through to my mail folders (in fact I wouldn't have noticed the problem at all if there hadn't been a series of messages from less spam-resistant users complaining about it :-). Kris --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFEZBdWry0BWjoQKURAkydAJ9rRYjsQQWlSdSu13omWLw7IjIWegCg872G W28RPb7JoUGk8UwJ6L1rI04= =YGx1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj--