From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 30 11:39:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80562106566B; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:39:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFE88FC20; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:39:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2UBdOmB063604; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:39:24 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m2UBdNLt063603; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:39:23 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:39:23 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein To: Remko Lodder Message-ID: <20080330113923.GB57135@svzserv.kemerovo.su> References: <47EE42C8.3070100@quip.cz> <20080329204344.GA66910@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20080330072137.GA35435@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <47EF69F0.1050304@FreeBSD.org> <20080330104525.GA57135@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <9C5282E0-B44F-4A07-A606-1783D7725B5A@elvandar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9C5282E0-B44F-4A07-A606-1783D7725B5A@elvandar.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: FreeBSD-Net mailing list , Brooks Davis , "Bruce M. Simpson" , Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Subject: Re: 7.0 - ifconfig create is not working as expected? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:39:32 -0000 On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 01:14:36PM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote: > >It worked. Now it does not work. Someone(tm) made the change. > >We have the CVS. Isn't there such thing as responsibility for changes? > >A dichotomy will show us who did the change :-) > > Given that the idea is that we dont expect to get to this anytime > soon, we welcome the person who does the analysis for us so that we > might be able to fix this quicker (if possible with all the changes > involved). The revision 1.120 of src/sbin/ifconfig broke this: "cvs update -D '2006/07/09 06:00:00'" gives us ifconfig binary what works and "cvs update -D '2006/07/10 00:00:00'" gives one that fails. The commit deals with interface cloning. Now I'm looking for the fix. This is POLA issue and such regressions should not be tolerated, there are already too many of them. Eugene Grosbein