From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 11 10:52:24 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92B816A41B for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:52:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690D913C48E for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IV3Ls-0007LA-5r for freebsd-geom@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:52:16 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:52:16 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:52:16 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:52:03 +0200 Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: <20070910084143.GA18587@garage.freebsd.pl> <1131.147.177.179.52.1189445556.squirrel@angst.csh.rit.edu> <20070910175539.GB1103@garage.freebsd.pl> <20070911095856.GA1110@garage.freebsd.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE09165FA329356DA8D5586CA" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20060911) In-Reply-To: <20070911095856.GA1110@garage.freebsd.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.4.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: geom label detaching partway through boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:52:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE09165FA329356DA8D5586CA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:22:12AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: >> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >> >>> Ah, version is not important actually. The problem is that both >>> /dev/da0s1a and /dev/label/geom0s1a have the same size and the same >>> metadata.=20 >> Doesn't glabel store it's metadata on the provider (da0) if used with = >> the "label" verb? If so, why isn't the produced geom (geom0) shorter b= y=20 >> one sector? If not, where does it store the metadata? :) >=20 > geom0 is one sector shorter than da0, but bsdlabel stuff, which defines= > partitions is the same for both, so geom0s1a and da0s1a have the same > size. You're right, if the bsdlabel was created on da0 instead of geom0. It's=20 not clear if the OP did that (question for the OP: did you?). --------------enigE09165FA329356DA8D5586CA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG5nNaldnAQVacBcgRA3omAKD7vVAjGgvLnLDdckCGqMogP6/L8QCg6a/M Z5PTVzhQu32MSsUdaVEEO7o= =pjp2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE09165FA329356DA8D5586CA--