From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 15:25:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113F716A40F for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 15:25:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tevans.uk@googlemail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9809313C489 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 15:25:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tevans.uk@googlemail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so456880ugh for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 08:25:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=FvebFniDA7g44OAAG4RQxjTxdP22GBVHli1z2lMIHA1sMJ6DnPaDvZ/3Kzd3QnxWgbqy+FhZC/ua4/RlCWGnS3y817GwplZWetAcNZgeQmOtsG7iVJGJevg/XYovIvmk4bTudSslxP2rMLN++TlktEtoCkPlDbEpl3c3DXW7xXg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=Agf5SdEW1mXcAO5l49g3bzwIxlcg0qxC7gfVX8Abx4rQKZbb8/fjgTMg9vEOH5+CcJAf53JIY0+kav039Wwc3NSsmaEnqErKt/gMaWRs2WZfC8SA6y1Av77CSTZO+u+D22+Lk3fQ5P4EOwPJlS9ScfCyvJLFzxxcsO5p3uNk8vE= Received: by 10.82.146.14 with SMTP id t14mr3030486bud.1179501953889; Fri, 18 May 2007 08:25:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1%693133673? ( [217.206.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y37sm161216iky.2007.05.18.08.25.44; Fri, 18 May 2007 08:25:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Evans To: "Brian A. Seklecki" In-Reply-To: <1179500233.41472.220.camel@soundwave.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com> References: <20070518090435.GB17241@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <1179500233.41472.220.camel@soundwave.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jf5FTs8lB+z1oq2igpFF" Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:25:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1179501936.1234.3.camel@zoot.mintel.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Native SATA vs. PATA-emulation - difference? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 15:25:56 -0000 --=-jf5FTs8lB+z1oq2igpFF Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 10:57 -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:04 +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > to UDMA33. I figure, they can safely be ignored? >=20 >=20 > Only if there isn't some massive performance degradation. =20 > ports/benchmarks/bonie++ can tell you that. =20 >=20 > As for the boot loader and your gmirror volumes; it's hard to say. It's > possible that there is some "absolute" or "non-relative" data in there > related to the device and the bus. >=20 > Also: Maybe the geometry of the devices changes between modes? >=20 > Send us the comparable dmesg(8) in both modes? >=20 > ~BAS >=20 On my Intel ICH7 based laptop, switching from SATA/PATA emulation to SATA native mode changes the device of my HD from ad0 to ad4.=20 YMMV --=-jf5FTs8lB+z1oq2igpFF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGTcVslcRvFfyds/cRAtkkAKCuDdWbnNtFJ1QLysB+v4zMe2P6GgCfdv+B HN3uFs6pdTpZ0tldwdX9twM= =07CB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jf5FTs8lB+z1oq2igpFF--