From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Mar 17 6:36:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from chmls06.mediaone.net (chmls06.mediaone.net [24.147.1.144]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBCF37B718 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 06:36:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from maucoin01@mediaone.net) Received: from mediaone.net (h0080c6f71dc7.ne.mediaone.net [24.218.18.93]) by chmls06.mediaone.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2HEZpU14710; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 09:35:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3AB37340.3B420914@mediaone.net> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 09:22:56 -0500 From: Michael Aucoin X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Young , Rick Hamell , Ted Mittelstaedt , Jeff Soule Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Different Device Names for Identical NICs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG All, Thanks very much for all the input. I thought I would give you an update. I was able to use both (3c509) NICs together after I rebuilt the kernel with ep1 (thanks, Rick). However, I was initially blocked by the NICs having the same IO address and IRQ. I reconfigured one of them (using the 3COM-supplied DOS utility) and all is well now. I have been brain dead about this whole thing, but I did not at first realize I would have to reconfigure the NIC. Is this usual? Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message