Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:00:37 +0200 From: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> To: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: intel 82579 nic support? Message-ID: <504B0935.4090400@omnilan.de> In-Reply-To: <504A326F.6060709@omnilan.de> References: <50491E26.1010106@omnilan.de> <CAFOYbcmS1jG0e5jxV0GoD7YoV9=OwJxXdY1EO6yZVmAGZm=A%2BA@mail.gmail.com> <5049ECAF.3020709@omnilan.de> <CAFOYbcmoTR6EyxJR0KGCCE3Yjodh7jQYezFtM2tuuMCT2mjhrw@mail.gmail.com> <504A326F.6060709@omnilan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig26464F0F04657B4510D62B6C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable schrieb Harald Schmalzbauer am 07.09.2012 19:44 (localtime): > ... > not too absurd ;-) But I think I can confirm that you are right and > passthrough with chipset-integrated devices is different (for ESXi), > since the 82579 passed through to a XP-guest doesn't work either! Update: Found a setup modification which makes passthrough of that integrated nic+phy working: If "interrupt remapping" is deactivated under VT-d in EFI-Setup-Menu, it works with XP. If additionally DMA-Support for VT-d is disabled, it also works with FreeBSD (9.1). -Harry --------------enig26464F0F04657B4510D62B6C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlBLCUUACgkQLDqVQ9VXb8jJdwCgwEQ26A3QMNj7Zzuffxc2fNgB ZJ4AnApIH6IG6DlIY/Lq4IKOX6JHBSxR =j+Ad -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig26464F0F04657B4510D62B6C--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?504B0935.4090400>