From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 24 07:13:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201F0106564A for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 07:13:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42EE8FC2A for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 07:12:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id m2O7Cs4J079001 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:12:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id m2O7CsnS078999; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:12:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA03775; Sun, 23 Mar 08 23:01:10 PST Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:00:38 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au Message-Id: <47e75196.glCaKOCWMQZ61T+O%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <1206332783.6973.95.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <1206332783.6973.95.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mac osX drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 07:13:00 -0000 > I know I keep asking about drivers, but what about Mac drivers? I > understand that Mac osX is based fairly well on BSD, so would the > drivers be portable? Last I heard, MacOs X userland was based on FreeBSD but the MacOS X kernel was Mach. The part of a driver that deals with the hardware might be portable, but it doesn't seem so likely for the part that deals with the OS.