From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 27 13:17:29 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9C28216A4CE; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:17:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5732C43D1F; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:17:29 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net)
Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD))
	id 1D5OIb-000H69-E8; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:17:29 +0100
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:17:29 +0100
From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net>
To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20050227131729.GG58447@voodoo.oberon.net>
References: <200502271256.j1RCu2Pr095143@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20050227125808.GF58447@voodoo.oberon.net>
	<20050227131254.GG826@arthur.nitro.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050227131254.GG826@arthur.nitro.dk>
X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon
X-NIC-HDL: KP869-RIPE
Keywords: 579279786
cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide
	article.sgml
X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees <cvs-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-doc>,
	<mailto:cvs-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-doc>,
	<mailto:cvs-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:17:30 -0000

On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 02:12:55PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> I really don't think that kind of information belong in the committers
> guide, but I don't care enough to discuss it further.

We don't have only ports/ committers, hence not everyone is similar
with ports infrastructure.  So I would leave this info, since it's
not unuseful.

> What do you think about the attached patch?

Looks fine, thanks!

-Kirill