From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 28 3:32:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from meow.osd.bsdi.com (meow.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1E037B718 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 03:32:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from murray@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (murray@localhost) by meow.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2SBVnZ86427; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 03:31:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from murray@osd.bsdi.com) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 03:31:49 -0800 (PST) From: Murray Stokely To: Arjan Knepper Cc: freebsd-hackers Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.3 and STL In-Reply-To: <3AC1A050.62BE0194@pop3.NL.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Arjan Knepper wrote: % Could anyone make recommandations on the STL to use with C++. I'm using % the build in gcc 2.95.2 on -stable and build in gcc 2.95.3 on -current. % % What is preffered the build-in STL (/usr/include/g++) or STLport? In general you should stick with the built-in STL. However, you may find it lacks certain features of the standard. The GCC team is slowly bringing STLport into their tree. For the moment, OpenOffice, at least requires STLport. - Murray To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message