Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 7 Sep 1995 08:44:50 +0800 (CST)
From:      Brian Tao <taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw>
To:        Bill Trost <trost@cloud.rain.com>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Do we *really* need logger(1)? 
Message-ID:  <Pine.SOL.3.91.950907083820.22792E-100000@gate>
In-Reply-To: <m0sqPDt-00004yC@cloud.rain.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 6 Sep 1995, Bill Trost wrote:
> 
> Logger requires no special permissions to run; anyone can run such a
> program.  Better yet, anyone could run such a program anywhere on the
> Internet, so syslogd(8) can also be used as a remote disk-filling
> service.  (And, since it's UDP-based, you can't tcp-wrap it...).

    syslog() and syslogd are the real problems.  What use is there for a
syslog service on port 514?  I don't see why it should even bother listening
to a network port.  It should only accept input from /dev/[k]log. 
--
Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao
taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.91.950907083820.22792E-100000>