From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 29 00:12:20 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA01044 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA01039 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:12:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA11846; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:13:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199704290713.AAA11846@implode.root.com> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Simon Shapiro cc: Michael Smith , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A Desparate Plea for Help... In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 28 Apr 1997 20:45:06 PDT." From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:13:46 -0700 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >unplugged. I am sure we have something like that already. Another thing >can >be (again, if it is not there already) is a strict versioning option, which >even linux has; It allows the kernel modules loader to verify that a given >module is of the proper/matching version before loading. This has been planned since the beginning, but as of yet noone has implemented it. At this point adding it might be a waste of time since we are looking at completely replacing the existing LKM system. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project