From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 07:12:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A7B9DCB for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 07:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp22.services.sfr.fr (smtp22.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6A71959 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 07:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [109.14.118.136]) by msfrf2208.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D934F7000195 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:06:14 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: sfrmc.priv.atos.fr; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none (no policy) header.from=listjm@club-internet.fr Received: from [192.168.1.67] (136.118.14.109.rev.sfr.net [109.14.118.136]) by msfrf2208.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9BFF57000194 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:06:14 +0200 (CEST) X-SFR-UUID: 20140903070614639.9BFF57000194@msfrf2208.sfr.fr Message-ID: <5406BDDC.1080205@club-internet.fr> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:06:04 +0200 From: Juan =?iso-8859-1?b?UmFt824=?= Molina Menor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... References: <540617CF.2080602@hiwaay.net> <54062D90.3020506@club-internet.fr> <540689B7.9000006@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <540689B7.9000006@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 07:12:44 -0000 > I am using pkg whenever possible, in preference to ports, however, there > are a few things that require ports (flash plugin for browsers, for > example) .... seems unavoidable. Is there a way to work around this issue ? I don’t see the issue: upgrade your packages when they become available in the official repositories (once a week) and the non-redistributable (i.e. Flash) or customized ports whenever they are updated. If you are careful and know what you are doing, you can mix them.