From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 00:38:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E4E106564A for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E78B1556B5; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E656B6E.5080105@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:38:06 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110901 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: wen heping References: <4E64C077.8050403@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , neal@nelson.name, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov Subject: Re: Maintainership of py-zopetesting and py-zopeevent X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:38:08 -0000 On 09/05/2011 16:35, wen heping wrote: > Would you send a PR of repocopy to rename these ports? My understanding is that we don't do port names with . in them. Can someone who knows more than I confirm one way or the other? -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/