Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 21:31:19 +0000 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Cc: igorpopov@newmail.ru Subject: Re: natd and tun Message-ID: <200404022131.21654.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <200404021751.i32Hpeud071280@chuck.bsdjpp.ath.cx> References: <20040402073338.26179.qmail@flock1.newmail.ru> <200404021751.i32Hpeud071280@chuck.bsdjpp.ath.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 02 April 2004 17:51, Jean-Pierre PARISY wrote: > On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 11:33:37 +0400, ????? ????? ?????????? wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a question: would be natd work with tun device? I had already > > asked this question when FreeBSD 5.2 were released > > Someone have answered to me that I should use ppp builtin nat, because > > divert sockets doesn't work with tun. Simple rules like this > > divert all from any to any via tun0 > > allow all from any to any > > did not work. > > I'm sure that this works: > > # Divert all packets through the tunnel interface. > /sbin/ipfw add 100 divert natd all from any to any via tun0 Note that libalias was broken for a short time. See: Message-Id: <200404021757.i32Hvv6R058197@repoman.freebsd.org> or http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libalias/alias.c#rev1.42 -- Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404022131.21654.max>