From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 22:35:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A608A1065672 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:35:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED848FC18 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:35:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F86941C69F; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:35:07 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72WPPFisNaF8; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:35:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id B842E41C6B4; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:35:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75EC4448EC; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:32:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <4992B4E6.1040607@quip.cz> Message-ID: <20090211223202.W53478@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20090207174104.Y93725@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4992B4E6.1040607@quip.cz> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails now in 7-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:35:10 -0000 On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > I have a question about INADDR_ANY in relation to new multi-IP jails. > It was discussed some time ago as PR 84215 [wildcard ip (INADDR_ANY) should > not bind inside a jail] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=84215 and > it seemed fixed, but manpage for jail is still saying: > > "Similarly, it might be a good idea to add an address alias flag such that > daemons listening on all IPs (INADDR_ANY) will not bind on that address, > which would facilitate building a safe host environment such that host > daemons do not impose on services offered from within jails." > > Can you please clarify the current state? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2008-November/000623.html -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.