From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Feb 13 01:50:02 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA03544
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 01:50:02 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA03529;
          Fri, 13 Feb 1998 01:50:01 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 01:50:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199802130950.BAA03529@hub.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports
Cc: 
From: Jun-ichiro Itoh <itojun@itojun.org>
Subject: Re: ports/5251: Update the port(ja-man-1.1e):japanese/man.
Reply-To: Jun-ichiro Itoh <itojun@itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/5251; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jun-ichiro Itoh <itojun@itojun.org>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, kiri@kiri.toba-cmt.ac.jp
Cc:  Subject: Re: ports/5251: Update the port(ja-man-1.1e):japanese/man.
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 18:44:53 +0900

 sorry to be late, but I'm in doubt.
 is it always necessery for jp-man to depend on mule?
 shouldn't jman.el be provided separately from jp-man?
 (I myself do not use emacs at all so I'm not very happy with this)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message