From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 8 13:20:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F04516A4DF for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:20:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BCB43D49 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:20:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 56795 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2006 13:10:56 -0000 Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([62.48.2.2]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Aug 2006 13:10:56 -0000 Message-ID: <44D88FA1.1000108@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:20:33 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek References: <20060628103238.GA815@genius.tao.org.uk> <20060628103949.GJ2005@catpipe.net> <3aaaa3a0606281940k63c77ebfga84a854b2cd4ed84@mail.gmail.com> <20060801084156.GD3440@genius.tao.org.uk> <20060801084053.GE22731@catpipe.net> <20060803110525.GE804@genius.tao.org.uk> <20060804183146.N15526@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060804150057.GP29827@catpipe.net> <20060807171605.GC838@genius.tao.org.uk> <20060808074550.GB1190@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <20060808074550.GB1190@garage.freebsd.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Josef Karthauser , Chris , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Dmitry Morozovsky , bz@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Can I pursuade someone to commit this patch? (Re: Multiple IP addresses in a jail.) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:20:34 -0000 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 06:16:05PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 05:00:58PM +0200, Phil Regnauld wrote: >>> Dmitry Morozovsky (marck) writes: >>>> I suppose pinging pjd@ did not work? ;) >>> Good question -- why did Pawel not commit them himself if he could ? :) >>> >> No idea. I sent him an email asking on 28 Jun 2006, but I've not had a >> reply. > > Sorry guys for the delay. > > I answer this very question too many time... :) > > There are few reason: > - From what I remember there were still some small issues in those > patch, but I know people are using them in production with success, so > maybe there are already gone or those issues don't exist for their > workload. > - What I'd really like to see in the tree is vimage or per-jail network > virtual interface or something, where one can bind selected IP > addresses to. I proposed this at BSDCan earlier this year and have found a way to implement it in a pretty clean way, however PHK was against it in general because it would make jails 'too heavyweight'. > - Currently Bjoern Zeeb is working on those patches and IPv6 for jails, > so he is the right person to ask the question. > > PS. I'm CCing it. -- Andre