Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 18:12:43 +0200 From: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> To: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "freebsd-x11@freebsd.org" <x11@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Changes in drm ports Message-ID: <20220502181243.30a6b67d7c85515540feb9f6@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: <o80f-nckm-wny@FreeBSD.org> References: <20220501200413.5e6b9e105b22b6e54888be1f@bidouilliste.com> <fslt-53y0-wny@FreeBSD.org> <o80f-nckm-wny@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 02 May 2022 18:06:49 +0200 Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > > Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> writes: > > > >> - For (futur) 13.1 users the default drm kmod port will still be > >> drm-fbsd13-kmod (tracking Linux 5.4) as long as 13.0 is supported. But > >> you also have the option to install directly drm-510-kmod in case you > >> hardware isn't supported in 5.4 > > > > Why keep drm-fbsd13-kmod when it can be replaced by drm-54-kmod? > > Note, both drm-fbsd13-kmod and drm-54-kmod are based on Linux 5.4 and > even have identical GH_TAGNAME. The main difference is SOURCE option and > unblocked -CURRENT in drm-54-kmod. > The SOURCE option is the main reason I didn't removed it as some people still uses it. I'll send a mail a bit before 13.0 is EoL as a warning that this will go. But I could change the drm-kmod metaport for 13.0 to use drm-54-kmod as it's mostly for package users. Will probably do that this week. -- Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20220502181243.30a6b67d7c85515540feb9f6>