From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 15 12:16:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE023106566C for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:16:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3EC8FC0A for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:16:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E98C521E; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:16:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:16:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=L/TjA0C0qGSsIJ7yw7fVol4kwtE=; b=E74LNbPrm2TbuUBu9vV/MFCpq1lj0o3EFm6V1mEA1zIhwNHeKAi6pEPusgfQswqiIQJav4QUKIqDaAcXaki35MovD7IP2xnk83G8Jq5lxYOQ2AEAeDhMPGSgtVvHmewurEGnuTJwzWhCo0MByKzOvrwivIpAxnVf0iF6tp7KABs= X-Sasl-enc: 1Ekhm8tarOzL26NL04lUo7EYV5bX7Q+AOiAeaOPpCHu3 1260879361 Received: from anglepoise.lon.incunabulum.net (cpc2-dals7-0-0-cust253.hari.cable.virginmedia.com [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E6F94AF3F0; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:16:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B277DFF.2050704@incunabulum.net> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:15:59 +0000 From: Bruce Simpson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "b. f." References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, dougb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: AHCI/ATA_CAM for dummies? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:16:04 -0000 b. f. wrote: > "The main regression of the new mode is a lack of ataraid alternative, to > support cheap BIOS-based ATA RAIDs. If somebody has time and wish to > port that code from inside ata(4) into GEOM module, to make it work over > CAM also, I would appreciate that and propose a help, if needed." > Please search stable@ archives for my bad experiences with ataraid. IMHO, this stuff needs serious attention before it could be considered useful, so the lack of ataraid in the new world order is not that much of a loss, to my mind anyway. cheers, BMS