From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 24 22:59:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CFC16A4CE for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 22:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp08.web.de (smtp08.web.de [217.72.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A45743D2D for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 22:59:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nakal@web.de) Received: from [217.81.253.225] (helo=[217.81.253.225]) by smtp08.web.de with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (WEB.DE 4.101 #91) id 1BSUxO-0004io-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 07:58:35 +0200 From: Martin To: Josh Elsasser In-Reply-To: <20040525003535.GB91089@jade.elsasser.org> References: <1144707194.20040524195834@sendmail.ru> <1085416744.1327.12.camel@klotz.local> <1072928479.20040524211013@sendmail.ru> <20040525003535.GB91089@jade.elsasser.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1085464712.319.18.camel@klotz.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 07:58:33 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: nakal@web.de cc: FreeBSD Current cc: Toxa Subject: Re: wi(4) and shared authmode X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 05:59:15 -0000 Am Tue, den 25.05.2004 schrieb Josh Elsasser um 2:35: > You could always use IPSEC. It's a bit more work to get up and > running, but you can rest easy knowing you have actual security. Yes, but many people don't even want that someone can connect to their AP. They try to setup authmode or at least WEP. I've turned on WEP and IPsec here, because of samba. It broadcasts itself and it's not getting tunneled this way. Has anyone a solution to this? (I mean: getting the broadcast encrypted, not splitting the networks) Martin