Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:07:45 -0700
From:      Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>
To:        "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program
Message-ID:  <CAGH67wSs_iDSs6kR8oRMQJCDGCpCNujFsmurbx-cAU3p=ta0pg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121026195424.8AE4858094@chaos.jnpr.net>
References:  <CAGH67wRkOmy7rWLkxXnT2155PuSQpwOMyu7dTAKeO1WW2dju7g@mail.gmail.com> <CDA41F27-73C1-47CF-B84D-2627B1F7E7D8@xcllnt.net> <20121001223100.E7D0D58093@chaos.jnpr.net> <FDE5A28C-297A-4476-B06E-638049E20C6C@gmail.com> <20121002000030.54CEE58093@chaos.jnpr.net> <CAGH67wSaFeVyr_uNfigNQ%2BOBy4JmiLMa_u7c7=aqgB7wDKzsLg@mail.gmail.com> <20121026165414.GA43599@dragon.NUXI.org> <CAGH67wS54AA3C%2B1D99dqBqKy-K1G5MVN0DERbaYbFsfCMmqHbA@mail.gmail.com> <20121026195424.8AE4858094@chaos.jnpr.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Simon J. Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:27:35 -0700, Garrett Cooper writes:
>>There are some basic examples, but they're in my p4 branch and
>>unfortunately they depend on atf.test.mk/bsd.test.mk/bsd.progs.mk
>
> Speaking of which.  I notice there is now a bsd.progs.mk in head, which
> bears little relationship to the one I was talking about (from
> devel/bmake).  Is this bsd.progs.mk essentially your port of netbsd's
> bsd.prog.mk it seems much more complex than should be necessary (my
> progs.mk is 75 lines vs 350 for the one in head).

Yup. I was a bit surprised it was committed, but there might have been
some confusion over what all was going to go in with the ATF port.

> Would you be awfully upset if I replace it with the simpler one?

    Nah. Feel free to nuke it and remove it from the build once you
get progs.mk in proper shape; I'm more concerned about completing the
atf.test.mk/bsd.test.mk snippets because once those are committed I
can get the test example code and the integration test patches
reviewed and committed.
Thanks!
-Garrett



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wSs_iDSs6kR8oRMQJCDGCpCNujFsmurbx-cAU3p=ta0pg>