From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Apr 4 13:24: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from tele-post-20.mail.demon.net (tele-post-20.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644AF37B720 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:23:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from si@chemicalterrorism.com) Received: from freebsd.demon.co.uk ([194.222.171.207] helo=chemicalterrorism.com) by tele-post-20.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 14ktop-000Pu6-0K; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 20:23:57 +0000 Received: from sycho (sycho.chemicalterrorism.com [192.168.0.2]) by chemicalterrorism.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D637F443; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 21:23:20 +0100 (BST) From: "Si" To: "Chuck" Cc: Subject: RE: Chasing the kiddies (was: Named Keep crashing) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 21:23:33 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:47:27 -0500 (CDT) Chuck Wrote: > Im not saying that the Admins should be stupid, just that there is only so > much one person can do. I agree with you there, I work for a small company that does specialist services and to be honest there's really me and err me. This means that anything even remotely connected to computing (Basically anything with a chip) is my responsibility. I don't feel its the SA that's at fault allot of the time, its the company and how they decide to prioritise jobs for the staff. Ohh yea, guess what, I'm currently seeking employment elsewhere, small companies can suck so badly. Si. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message