From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 2 23:16:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6005E16A409 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 23:16:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E199E13C465 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 23:16:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s1so332589nze for ; Wed, 02 May 2007 16:16:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=HjIYhciPCyiN+n2/tNxLDsKatOvQ1EvU6JRx67+xKut5SVeSUajhodHQadsLxTsEokjlhMHqUiNIi9E9UraaQBwHLqUIrTV1kV5a4e6uwNSkl/9qMIm2RzZh4S7LXWAAmBsuMIxxUxLkGkL8SWVsD4gsnWw58NkBpF76yW6EDrU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=UKnjRR7Q/Dv0AtdSk5kVOX5JIc87XTlwXhlpFIquYfjDyED4oPEp40TqiPEynaU3u3uX1LzChbRVOKNurlnoCJ63ICLHbXYR/9dbQ0k7yWgspACAZVbjcpJDP40VFuL9p/RTG94ujIDhoeHGfTCp0EGVNfWrNyDaSc1bekyL7Ug= Received: by 10.115.77.1 with SMTP id e1mr425927wal.1178147760890; Wed, 02 May 2007 16:16:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.194.5 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2007 16:16:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:16:00 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "FreeBSD Ports" , "Chin-San Huang" , "Andrey Slusar" , "Stanislav Sedov" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: d607fdb6891d2730 Cc: Subject: Re: xpi updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 23:16:02 -0000 On 3/30/07, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > Dear xpi-extensions maintainers, > > Some of you granted me an implicit approval for > routine updates of your xpi ports. That was some > time ago and now I ask you to renew the approval. > If you want to, just reply to this mail (you > don't need to include all the recipients, of > course) to tell me it's okay. > > I would gladly send you patches for approval, but > in most cases an update takes a few seconds, while > the total time spent on patches and approvals can > amount to minutes per update. It's just a question > of efficiency. Dear Chin-San, Andrey and Stanislav! All other xpi-maintainers have already responded. Here's a short list of out-of-date extensions: xpi-unplug xpi-sessionmanager xpi-vimperator I'll be glad if you could grant me an implicit approval to update your xpi-ports for you whenever I perform version-bump sweeps of my own ports. Stanislav, welcome to our little xpi club :-) When dealing with others' ports I usually try to be as little intrusive as possible - performing only the very necessary/minor changes and keeping the style intact. Anyway, it's okay if all of you prefer to keep your ports to yourself, but I would appreciate a (negative) response anyway just to be sure it's not a matter of a lost e-mail. Thanks guys!