From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Jun 20 12:36:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9856637BC13 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 12:36:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA24751; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 13:36:23 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA20788; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 13:36:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 13:36:19 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200006201936.NAA20788@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Warner Losh , mjacob@feral.com, Matthew Dillon , freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP discussion moving to freebsd-smp In-Reply-To: <55142.961529404@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <200006201902.NAA71105@harmony.village.org> <55142.961529404@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I don't agree with your rather rabid "current must always work" ^^^^^^^^^^^^ I disagree that's his attitude is rabid. This is an attempt by you to make this is a personal attack, rather than a techincal argument. > attitude, having been one of the primary people through the > 1.0 to 2.0 transition I know how many developers that cost us. And how many would that be? I don't remember the masses leaving us because of the 1.0 -> 2.0 transition, but because of the lawsuit. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message