From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr  1 21:32:38 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13287157;
 Wed,  1 Apr 2015 21:32:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861A520C3;
 Wed,  1 Apr 2015 21:32:37 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <551C63F6.2050700@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:32:38 -0400
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>, "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug
References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C6051.4060803@FreeBSD.org>
 <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com>
In-Reply-To: <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Dirk Meyer <dinoex@freebsd.org>, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:32:38 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 04/01/2015 17:21, Yuri wrote:
> On 04/01/2015 14:17, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> I know bsd.openssl.mk has been broken for very long time.  For
>> example,
>> 
>> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50108FEF.3030405
>> 
>> However, I am not sure whether entirely removing it is the best
>> way going forward.
> 
> I mean, removing of the dependency on base. Ports should use only 
> openssl port.
> 
> If you think this isn't a good idea, and ports should still
> occasionally use base openssl, would you care to explain why you
> think so?

I don't like to see adding "-Wl,-rpath,${LOCALBASE}/lib" to LDFLAGS
for all ports depending on libcrypto, etc.  If it is moved to separate
directories first, then it makes some sense, though.

Jung-uk Kim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVHGPwAAoJEHyflib82/FGX8YIAIefRcO47zRHmojZ4E0gS15J
Y4bWyCFFVpIjuEDW4kQ6mFK83lJz9DD+KWfn/FFJrxAvmFpKnw4jJ8UtqsH1KuRp
o9fXPH6TGVZqvM33KCWSdDBKw/7Pu29gQjxnHmN5R8aa96oTYA7yR09BWAKcQs37
ZOrwJBcKKt03KZtvYYkc3GeK5oKKIuC1DNporYzoWFCKzrtzKDIUBJgPIePrWF6a
QGvZe85D9nwk5WCoVAw26FHV4sGpd7DMFxgkm5EfiYVvte9El3rDrIRkLLxkYqzV
C3M7pbuQ8Uf9gGUcuBnrfpWU42jVGNjvpq2w7sBQAJibeOh1TlwaDLNtS7H5ctU=
=+7Bt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----