From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 21 22:25:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA15082 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 22:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from post-ofc05.srv.cis.pitt.edu (post-ofc05.srv.cis.pitt.edu [136.142.185.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA15077 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 22:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from morose.rmt.net.pitt.edu (ehdup-c2-9.rmt.net.pitt.edu [136.142.20.159]) by post-ofc05.srv.cis.pitt.edu with SMTP (8.8.5/cispo-2.0.1.7) ID for ; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 01:21:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970422012343.007a5100@pop.pitt.edu> X-Sender: jddst19@pop.pitt.edu X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 01:23:43 -0400 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: John Duncan Subject: Re: flex vs. lex Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 09:51 PM 4/21/97 -0400, you wrote: >Does anyone know how to take an old program that depends on lex quirkiness >(such as rewriting input() ) and make it work with flex? Any pointers? I've >been searching for an hour now and havent found a thing :( > >-Crh > > Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu > > http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich > Get a copy of lex from gatekeeper? That'd be my idea because it won't put GNU copylefts on all your stuff. Sometimes it's not worth upgrading a file incrementally. I know of no lex2flex reengineering tools. -John If you ever see an ambulance with sirens blaring and twin 50mm cannons on top, do not interpret this as a Good Sign. Be very, very frightened, in fact.