From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 19 03:19:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E68216A54D for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 03:19:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay02.pair.com (relay02.pair.com [209.68.5.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53B4043D4C for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 03:19:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 38003 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2005 03:19:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 19 Apr 2005 03:19:20 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:19:16 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: Ian Dowse In-Reply-To: <200504190229.aa14402@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Message-ID: <20050418221821.L9295@odysseus.silby.com> References: <200504190229.aa14402@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Damien Bergamini cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 Makefile ipw.4 iwi.4 ral.4ural.4 src/sys/conf files src/sys/dev/ipw if_ipw.c if_ipwreg.h if_ipwvar.h pccarddevs src/sys/dev/ral if_ral.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 03:19:23 -0000 On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Ian Dowse wrote: > In message <200504181847.j3IIlcjh018258@repoman.freebsd.org>, Damien Bergamini > writes: >> Initial import of ipw, iwi, ral and ural drivers: > > Woohoo, finally! I've been using the ipw driver for a few months > now and it's been working really well. I get the occasional "ipw0: > fatal error" that requires an ifconfig down/up to fix, but it's > probably still the most reliable FreeBSD wireless driver that I've > used yet. > > I presume it's still necessary for people to download the firmware > and ipwcontrol ultility to use the driver? > > Anyway, thanks for the great work! > > Ian Due to the firmware license, we decided that it wouldn't be appropriate in the base system. And, since you can't go anywhere with the firmware, it makes sense to put the related tools in with the port. The ports will be coming soon. Mike "Silby" Silbersack