Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:37:35 -0800 From: "Loren M. Lang" <lorenl@alzatex.com> To: Gregor Mosheh <stigmata_blackangel@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: umass stability 5.3 versus 4.10 Message-ID: <20050204013735.GC8619@alzatex.com> In-Reply-To: <20050202230915.8471.qmail@web53809.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050202230915.8471.qmail@web53809.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 03:09:15PM -0800, Gregor Mosheh wrote: > I've written to the list several times in regards to > my USB external hard drive. In summary: Under 4.10 it > worked fine for 5 months and then mysteriously it quit > working. > > The documentation I found for ehci+umass (albeit > 3-year-old docs) implied that ehci was "not completely > stable", and its omission until 4.10 (and my own > experience with it) makes me believe that. > > My question, though, is: Is ehci+umass considered > "production quality" under 5.3? Not that this gives a real answer, but I having been using a high-speed sandisk flash drive on both FreeBSD 5.3 and 5.2.1 running on two different systems without any problems. > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. > http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050204013735.GC8619>