From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 28 18:58:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6FC56D; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:58:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mailch-2.name-services.com (mailch-2.name-services.com [98.124.252.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884A22F88; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:58:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailch.name-services.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailch.name-services.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C76A462D6B8; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:53:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Sender-Id: 184.56.64.106 Received: from mail-24.name-services.com (sjl0vwsmail09.prod.dm.local [10.7.17.59]) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/4.8.23); Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:53:10 GMT X-Pool-Id: 3 Received: from [10.0.10.1] (cpe-184-56-64-106.neo.res.rr.com [184.56.64.106]) by mail-24.name-services.com with SMTP; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:53:03 -0700 Message-ID: <521E470F.2000605@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:53:03 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "illoai@gmail.com" Subject: Re: distfiles changed to new path References: <521D40A8.5020602@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:58:22 -0000 illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 27 August 2013 20:13, Fbsd8 wrote: >> I just did a portsnap run that updated the base port system. >> >> Now I see a port's distfile going to /var/ports/distfiles instead of >> /usr/ports/distfiles. >> >> Is this a error in the newly updated base port system which contains the >> default port make environment? >> > > Nothing seems to set it like that here. > (ports svn r325494 right now on 9.2-RC3) > Are you sure you don't have a spurious DISTDIR > declaration somewhere? > I just installed 9.2-RC3 .iso and the problem went away. I must have shot myself in the foot somehow on my old 9.1-release system. Not worth the effort to look for the cause on my old system. Thanks for verifying location of distfile directory has not changed.