Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:21:59 +0100 From: Ulf Lilleengen <lulf@pvv.ntnu.no> To: Alexandr Rybalko <ray@dlink.ua> Cc: geom@freebsd.org, embedded@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM_ULZMA Message-ID: <20100304102158.GA8092@nobby.geeknest.org> In-Reply-To: <20100219163644.da89e882.ray@dlink.ua> References: <20100219163644.da89e882.ray@dlink.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 04:36:44PM +0200, Alexandr Rybalko wrote: > Hi, > I wrote a module GEOM_ULZMA (such as GEOM_UZIP, but compression with lzma), in connection with this is an issue best left lzma > code in the file "geom_ulzma.c" or store lzma library separately. If separately, then where better? > > Maybe in future make lzma and gzip library kernel interface for embedded? > Then in one instance of code, userland can use compression via kernel. > What are the cons against combining uzip/ulzma into a geom_z/geom_compress module that can support different compression schemes? I think this makes more sense than having different geom modules for each compression scheme. -- Ulf Lilleengen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100304102158.GA8092>