From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 6 17:32:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F117D16A4D3 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 17:32:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCBA43D62 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 17:32:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B1F69A8C; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 13:32:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 13:32:39 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Emil Isberg Message-Id: <20040906133239.2c42ffb7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20040906171837.03ff8170@imap.pyttemjuk.se> References: <6.1.2.0.2.20040906171837.03ff8170@imap.pyttemjuk.se> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: external todo patch to qmail (ports) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 17:32:44 -0000 Emil Isberg wrote: > Hi, > > I sent the following message to the qmail port maintainer. > External todo patch is a good option to have for busy mailservers since if > you continously get email to your smtp-server then qmail-send can't keep up > with both todo-queue and spawning qmail-local/qmail-remote. > > I don't suggest changing the default install, but only add external todo as > an option for those of us that use freebsd and qmail for busy mailservers. > > I have not yet received any response from the qmail port maintainer so I > wonder where I should go and whom I should turn to to get it included in > the port or a reason why it shouldn't be added. Have you filed a PR? http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com