From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jun 6 23:49:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CE537B405; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 23:49:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f576njV09040; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 00:49:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200106070649.f576njV09040@harmony.village.org> To: Mike Smith Subject: Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , Dima Dorfman , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 Jun 2001 23:20:30 PDT." <200106070620.f576KUB05343@mass.dis.org> References: <200106070620.f576KUB05343@mass.dis.org> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 00:49:45 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200106070620.f576KUB05343@mass.dis.org> Mike Smith writes: : Actually, I do recall discussion over 'wd' being end-of-lifed in 4.x. I : suspect that it would make sense to EOL 'mfs' in a similar fashion. I : don't think there's a lot of good sense in pulling it out at an arbitrary : point, though, any more than there was in pulling 'wd' like it was. wd can't be totally EOLd until ata is smart enough to deal with pc98's controllers. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message