From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 21:11:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9580F16A400 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofe-freebsd-embedded@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F14713C44C for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofe-freebsd-embedded@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HzepS-0004I5-Ke for freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:25:02 +0200 Received: from d463cd6f.datahighways.de ([212.99.205.111]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:25:02 +0200 Received: from ino-news by d463cd6f.datahighways.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:25:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org From: clemens fischer Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:09:09 +0200 Organization: more-or-less Lines: 23 Message-ID: <5ksdk4xsa3.ln2@nntp.spotteswoode.dnsalias.org> References: <20070611214113.GC44552@tirith.brixandersen.dk> <200706120921.09263.freebsd-embedded@dino.sk> <20070612083825.GA56032@tirith.brixandersen.dk> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: d463cd6f.datahighways.de User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: JTAG recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:11:27 -0000 Henrik Brix Andersen in <20070612083825.GA56032@tirith.brixandersen.dk>: > That's not the issue here - I was asking what other people on FreeBSD > use for their JTAG needs, seeing that OpenOCD isn't in ports I doubt > that is in widespread use among FreeBSD users (else, someone would > have submitted a port). well, i actually use the openOCD software with a wiggler. there's a small patch needed re. port-IO, which i can send you. the original is based on linux-only, which has port and value reversed, and fbsd needs different includes. Dominic Rath keeps forgetting about us, although i had sent him the patch. i think he wants something more generic than a simple "#ifdef __FreeBSD__ ... #endif" scheme. you should use the version from the SVN repo. as is state-of-the-art with fbsd, you'd have to use the right auto* version numbers for the bootstrapping. ohhh... i just noticed "svn update" won't do with my old sources. this means i'll have to checkout the entire tree again. no time for that now. regards, clemens