From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 12:51:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E489B16A468; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timur@com.bat.ru) Received: from mail.bat.ru (dzokonda.xs4all.nl [194.109.164.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5334C13C468; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timur@com.bat.ru) Received: from timur.home.bat.ru ([192.168.0.4] verified) by mail.bat.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.7) with ESMTP-TLS id 383401; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:52:50 +0200 Received: (from timur@localhost) by timur.home.bat.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l55CphUO056745; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:51:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from timur) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:51:43 +0200 From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" To: "Simon L. Nielsen" Message-ID: <20070605125142.GE22215@com.bat.ru> References: <5fbf03c20706050031p6f25d02cyae7a91593e40171a@mail.gmail.com> <20070605082244.GB22215@com.bat.ru> <20070605093702.GB1026@zaphod.nitro.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070605093702.GB1026@zaphod.nitro.dk> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, "Timur I. Bakeyev" Subject: Re: [net/samba3] Upgrade to Samba 3.0.25a X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:51:45 -0000 On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:37:03AM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2007.06.05 10:22:44 +0200, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote: > > BTW. in cases like this, where the maintainer want to fix a security > issue but would prefer to wait with a full upgrade, you might want to > try and poke the FreeBSD Security Team (secteam@) since we might have > patches to only fix the issue security issue(s). Specifically for > Samba we normally do get patches from the Samba developers for their > security advisories. As a maintainer I get the patches as well, as well as an early access to the tarballs. But with such border cases when new release comes with new features and security fixes all together it's nice to have ability to provide both versions - old one with just sec fixes and new one with new features. As we don't have ports versioning yet, employing -devil suffix could be reasonable solution to provide both versions. With best regards, Timur Bakeyev.