Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 11:25:46 -0500 (CDT) From: "Thomas H. Ptacek" <tqbf@enteract.com> To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG, sef@Kithrup.COM Subject: Re: Proposed alternate patch for the rfork vulnerability Message-ID: <199708041625.LAA21165@enteract.com> In-Reply-To: <199708040651.QAA08668@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Aug 4, 97 04:51:41 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I think exec should just fail if it can't honour setuid'ness. For ptrace Why? What does this win? ---------------- Thomas Ptacek at EnterAct, L.L.C., Chicago, IL [tqbf@enteract.com] ---------------- "If you're so special, why aren't you dead?"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199708041625.LAA21165>