Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:36:55 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 279777] net/openmpi, net/mpich: Suggestion to drop slurm-wlm dependency Message-ID: <bug-279777-7788-V1QwsKpkGG@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-279777-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-279777-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D279777 --- Comment #8 from Laurent Chardon <laurent.chardon@gmail.com> --- I also think that the default option should not depend on Slurm, as I see no reason for it. MPI and batch scheduling are complementary but distinct from each other. In fact, it appears from the above comments that Slurm and MPI = are not currently used together on FreeBSD. I'll make flavors of openmpi and mpich with Slurm, with the base being independent of any scheduler. I won't make a TORQUE flavor, as it seems to = no longer receive updates. The last TORQUE release dates back from 8 years ago= and sysutils/torque is flagged as deprecated with expiry set to the end of this month.=20 I would have liked to make these changes at the next version upgrade, as th= ere is a chance, even if minor, that it will create a disruption to some users.= I'd rather not do that in a port revision if it can be avoided, but the TORQUE removal is somewhat forcing my hand. Thoughts? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-279777-7788-V1QwsKpkGG>