From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 20 16:05:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53398BFB; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.scaleengine.net (beauharnois2.bhs1.scaleengine.net [142.4.218.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE62FF6; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (Seawolf.HML3.ScaleEngine.net [209.51.186.28]) (Authenticated sender: allanjude.freebsd@scaleengine.com) by mx1.scaleengine.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26BB99E327; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <550C4552.3030303@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:05:38 -0400 From: Allan Jude User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fedor Indutny , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SA_SIGINFO | SA_RESETHAND fix backport References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="reBrtmH2nMsSn8KwbPThCUXUfFM8wqG2A" Cc: Mark Johnston X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:05:22 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --reBrtmH2nMsSn8KwbPThCUXUfFM8wqG2A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2015-03-20 01:00, Fedor Indutny wrote: > Hello people! >=20 > While trying to fix node.js/io.js issue with signal handling > on FreeBSD 10.1, I have found that the problem was due to a kernel > bug. Luckily that bug is fixed in: >=20 > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/4501dadd00cece6d06392c42e5fc6= af07731e451 >=20 > But it looks like the fix wasn't backported to 10.x . >=20 > Do you think it might be possible to do it? I'd really appreciate > this. >=20 > Thank you, > Fedor. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 That change was merged to the stable/10 branch in December https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D275456 --=20 Allan Jude --reBrtmH2nMsSn8KwbPThCUXUfFM8wqG2A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVDEVVAAoJEJrBFpNRJZKffCYQALlORrDsJbis8qlffFz7np9W B180eF6QfB5qqoZxkw8XIdN9vgcx3ol4qNgS3uJVeBBIEnwGwXulO5YOyPHWR2eB 6fsE40+LvsuTcLtQn/vWw25qzkWJ6bwTHQaTgPpZHdYU6AWuqhx+r+/laV3VQL9f 1dJg3dGV+tYAiiaLPiAJy8Ub/MBQAjF2oPzA0jsWGqRSH7k2G91JQTKqYjtDBn68 ancc4UaMKedug9cYUqnp4bbKv+v9DSXKcgreCDWt1wxQmKz4OHbu6WbLdSGJbLLv J8uwfThDpqRO/D5xLA/9DTq7R0kcI+HKHkfTZgk1t73OH5M2+1grDKUxRpFhjTPO 8ZIY+OgSLbIilWS7Jr3P4eEDXGzMYG5KWOc3kvbxfKPGim7gJ9LBeU+QzbmMBw9c wF7EeY9OPsS0HIhmOCLgQT4maynvQ7G8tKub6JoOECvVlokCmu7qCqqIcIrp53o/ pXZm8jFo2P36dwhXuSdZXCtumkjLdK5b0F3ZrYbZgCTe5eR5mbdeBzH6ofTTvawP I/0gqb5w+IePsZLpXTtwbi0Rb0HW0xJ5JqxgSzV4zezJD3dRjqzQB/qGLC/e8TPB 1ZT/BIOGjEntHYo5FDBzoLbnDLzFzMt2aFE+KQBI1JvFT0Nnuu/qaxYsIMt+pCef wK2Qocy0k3IuQG2uamJt =S6T1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --reBrtmH2nMsSn8KwbPThCUXUfFM8wqG2A--