From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 2 20:55:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA03415 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 20:55:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA03358; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 20:54:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.com [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 0y9jj8-00079t-00; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 20:54:50 -0800 Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 20:54:46 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: "John S. Dyson" cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.0-RELEASE? In-Reply-To: <199803030440.XAA00843@dyson.iquest.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 2 Mar 1998, John S. Dyson wrote: > > It seems to me that they even have kernel threading too, although it > > seems to me that their threads are a bit heavy (almost pseudo-processes). > > > So will we in 3.0. (I already have the infrastructure, and work is kind > of in progress for a good API interface.) What about this AIO and database stuff you kept alluding too? Or is it secret? :) It is kinda of interesting that Solidtech ported their Solid server to FreeBSD 2.2, but performance is so-so because of lack of threading. > -- > John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, > dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, > jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig. > > Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message