From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 23:22:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A937816A531 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:22:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0262343D53 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:22:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anb.matik.com.br (anb.matik.com.br [200.152.88.34] (may be forged)) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k51NMRmg068426; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 20:22:39 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR To: Sam Leffler Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 20:22:21 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200606010641.52222.joao@matik.com.br> <447F114A.2010306@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <447F114A.2010306@errno.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606012022.21567.joao@matik.com.br> X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (msrv.matik.com.br) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: Antispam Datacenter Matik msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: possible ifconfig / wi bug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 23:23:08 -0000 On Thursday 01 June 2006 13:09, Sam Leffler wrote: > If I recall correctly the wi driver leaves rate control decisions to the > firmware and has no way of knowing what the current tx rate is for each > client. > ok, understood since the prism cards I use are working fine this is no problem at all could be better to display NA or something in order not getting confused btw seems "wicontrol -l" does not show any stations anymore and replies=20 0 stations=20 and -L returns Available APs: wicontrol: SIOCSWAVELAN: Operation not permitted Jo=E3o > There have been patches floating around for a while to do tx rate > control in the driver instead (in which case this info would be > available) but they were never committed because of reported bugs. It > might be time to just commit the code anyway (to HEAD) in order to force > the bug(s) to be resolved. > A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br