Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 09:47:37 +0100 From: Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, dvl@FreeBSD.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Flavors, and specifically, Python flavors landing today Message-ID: <049DA298-4F20-4CE8-8741-615B154537FA@lastsummer.de> In-Reply-To: <6b3461af-c1fc-a149-cd93-c92054fe2c4b@FreeBSD.org> References: <7c9a5e55-505f-9160-2886-56c451cdf9b1@FreeBSD.org> <10532992-C4F8-4527-BBA5-DD3B845B29E4@lastsummer.de> <6b3461af-c1fc-a149-cd93-c92054fe2c4b@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 1. Dec 2017, at 9:28 AM, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > Le 01/12/2017 =C3=A0 07:20, Franco Fichtner a =C3=A9crit : >> Hi, >>=20 >>> On 30. Nov 2017, at 4:32 PM, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>>=20 >>> | See Ports now have flavors enabled| >>> | Tool developers, see https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/FlavorsTools| >>> | All Python dependencies must have @${PY_FLAVOR} appended to them| >> Very nice work, a thank you to all the people who worked on this! :) >>=20 >> Preliminary build tests from here look as fine as ever, although the >> full batch is still running. >>=20 >> FWIW, I found that fetch-recursive stopped working with FLAVOR set: >=20 > You will find that not setting FLAVOR will make it work just fine. > (There are no ports that will fetch differently wrt flavors, so do not > set it.) Indeed, that's what I did. Is this working as intended? You do not see this as an incompatibility within the framework WRT FLAVOR and -recursive targets? If yes, will this be documented as such before it is reported again? Cheers, Franco
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?049DA298-4F20-4CE8-8741-615B154537FA>