Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 20:44:29 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: virenp@mail.utexas.edu Cc: Sam Lawrance <boris@brooknet.com.au>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Aide port broken in 5.4? Message-ID: <20596114@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <41326.146.6.178.5.1117038317.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> (Viren Patel's message of "Wed, 25 May 2005 11:25:17 -0500 (CDT)") References: <3578.146.6.135.76.1116702794.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> <20648162@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <43618.146.6.178.5.1117033514.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> <1117034205.1821.28.camel@dirk.no.domain> <41326.146.6.178.5.1117038317.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 25 May 2005 11:25:17 -0500 (CDT) Viren Patel wrote: > pkg_info on the 5.3 system says it's Aide-0.10_1. The > Makefile says is 0.10_1. The Makefiles on both are the > same except for the Makefile version number and the BROKEN > line in the 5.4. Running "aide --version" on both 5.3 and > 5.4 reports 0.10. So I am not sure what's going on here. As I understand part 5.2.2.1 "PORT REVISION" of the Porter's Handbook if a port got to have marked as BROKEN, there is no reason to change the port_revision_number. And the same is when the port is got to be unmarked. > Viren WBR -- bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20596114>