From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 14 06:55:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 352D31065672; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 06:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 06:55:11 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh Message-ID: <20110214065511.GA6542@FreeBSD.org> References: <201102140301.p1E31U36047001@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110214060442.GA1488@FreeBSD.org> <20110214063258.GB80592@bonjour.sunpoet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110214063258.GB80592@bonjour.sunpoet.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Martin Wilke Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/tortoisehg1 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 06:55:11 -0000 On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:32:58PM +0800, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 06:04:42AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:01:30AM +0000, Martin Wilke wrote: > > > > > > Modified files: > > > devel Makefile > > > Added files: > > > devel/tortoisehg1 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist > > > Log: > > > TortoiseHg is a Windows shell extension and a series of > > > applications for the Mercurial distributed revision control > > > system. It also includes a Gnome/Nautilus extension and > > > a CLI wrapper application so the TortoiseHg tools can be > > > used on non-Windows platforms. > > > > Please readd this as "tortoisehg"; shar in PR apparently contains a > > typo, since PR subject uses correct name. And please try to be more > > accurate in the future. Thanks. > > No, it's not a typo. As the submitter mentioned in the discussion on the > mailing list, the newer version (tortoisehg 2.x) will be released soon. > Therefore, I suggested the submitter to use tortoisehg1 for 1.x and > reserve tortoisehg for 2.x. Ah, that's explains it. I suspected something like this, but found no evidence in PR backlog. Thanks for clarification, and sorry Martin. :-) However, commit message should have contained this information so people would not have to ask questions. ./danfe