Date: 16 Jun 1999 09:44:02 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, Holtor <holtor@yahoo.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD's FTP Daemon Message-ID: <xzpbtegegjh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: "David O'Brien"'s message of "Tue, 15 Jun 1999 19:54:47 -0700" References: <19990608104549.4750.rocketmail@web113.yahoomail.com> <xzphfoiudd0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <19990615195447.B65028@nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > I totally disagree. One of my 486DX2/66 boxes became a warez site over > a year ago (w/out my knowledge). The load from all the FTPs taking place > on this small box was incredible. 100 clients made the box totally > dead. I tried NcFTPd just for fun and found I could still get a login > and do things (admititly *very* slowly). Did you try stock ftpd compiled with INTERNAL_LS? Did you run both FTP daemons under similar circumstances (both standalone, or both through inetd)? Can you document that they were subjected to equal load? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpbtegegjh.fsf>