From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 12 02:29:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8E8106564A for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 02:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CA58FC08 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 02:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwg14 with SMTP id 14so4190540wwg.31 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:29:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=zZ7EaAIRxIqaNcQMtM6c9FttfsfVgGD6CLFbkRMI4kk=; b=Ij/IddVgpLnQfecL5HV2JQS+2D+DhTu2GR8tieGJywzyTjHuijqsBRHh83gA4dAsLo rTIh5D0gKqY5t8sOD22hIwDq+C84zBHMPLcEqiF44vaI+QVU7UGbqZKRHwPRPn5AdSMi W3BMwiiLcUvCXatzSVPskTBvrEWc6wCTH1M7g= Received: by 10.216.203.163 with SMTP id f35mr2534095weo.56.1321064992387; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:29:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.21.133 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:29:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201111111304.41222.benny.goemans@belgacom.net> From: Eitan Adler Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:29:21 -0500 Message-ID: To: Torfinn Ingolfsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: mysql-gui-tools X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 02:29:55 -0000 On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > It doesn't look like the Porter's Handbook has a section on > re-animating dead ports. Not yet. > But you could always submit it as a new port (with your fix included): This is the important part. You need to fix the reason it was removed (perhaps by becoming the upstream maintainer as well) FWIW I'd prefer a "patch" against the old version instead of a shar like a new port. I don't know how other committers feel about this. > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html If you need help just ask on this list. > I guess that would also make you the new port maintainer. Yep -- Eitan Adler