Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:31:25 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Can the disklabel(8) link go now? Message-ID: <20040607103125.GA1352@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20040607100616.GE29340@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040604092313.GA12314@ip.net.ua> <20040607100616.GE29340@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:06:16AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 12:23:13PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > I'd like to remove the old compatibility link from bsdlabel(8) > > to disklabel(8). I think the dust has settled enough to allow > > this to be done now (and before 5.3-RELEASE): >=20 > NO. We've been thru this not that long ago. >=20 > We should leave the disklable symlink forever -- it gives us a consistant > command interface across all our platforms. I've found NetBSD very > anonying in the past that the labeling command has a different name > across different platforms. The symlink causes no harm. Why are you on > such a war path to kill it?? >=20 I've just been wading through my old local diffs, and wanted to finally nail this thing down. Now that it is clear that the minimal consensus is to keep this (hard) link for at least a few more years, I've reverted this diff locally, and quickly started to forget about it. ;) Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAxEP9qRfpzJluFF4RAgIeAKCelHehzbLfkIaylwiS3uDqqGWIFQCgjomE L4Vx5lo4OrRghM7lMXQEJFY= =Dm50 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040607103125.GA1352>