From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 15:47:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A71587C; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D40A1A88; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:47:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id t60so7096785wes.24 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:47:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AxDVbuHqlRugWMMrVk3q/NOc29DA/5zPImOF07Tf58Q=; b=eQ9Lq7k7B18As5pPjxEHyCaR0F75LCOevNkKsY+MBQF5RSW7kP6EozfKcf/pHTeNR9 0xjbo6fXy1UN4CN+VFmpztcqEckS1Y13hGAL7DJaShkIwrQzFijnJJ9zO2JXIC8R+K9W uGcwtvG/GepEoKRgkDcyZFp4GWeZNbAxAcGLIeLrCYgaWTEmjSkxvDjDe3knzqmDtU6n Fo8egZhOBudN8lm/TXpcdeIQ9z1z/R+NppmMqhjXwQi4bNKSDLBm+tmIeSvGishdI9eK k4tGLxnezg/ZnA2ALYaY1D9JF63TjUqlQLNT57oKBNjiNj6tLiJEVjsHhUJ6FgmZYsmV 6mxw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.35.133 with SMTP id h5mr29159901wij.74.1409672869633; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:47:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.2.18 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:47:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5405E4F5.4090902@sorbs.net> References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> <1D2B4A91-E76C-43A0-BE75-D926357EF1AF@gmail.com> <5405E4F5.4090902@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:47:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool From: Brandon Allbery To: Michelle Sullivan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "pkg@freebsd.org" , "stable@freebsd.org" , "current@freebsd.org" , "ports@freebsd.org" , "mva@freebsd.org" , Garrett Cooper X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:47:52 -0000 On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > This is my only option - however, I suspect I'm already f**ked - my > build servers kicked off at 4am and the non pkg jails automatically > converted themselves to pkg.. the pkg jails obviously continued... > however I now have a repo that contains half pkg versions in the same > directory structure and indexes as the pkg_install structure... > So, the flip side of enterprise software management is that you probably should not be integrating a rolling release like ports into what is supposed to be a stable verified environment in the first place. *Especially* not via cron jobs with no supervision. At the very least, your jails should be working from a local ports tree (or packages via poudriere), with cherry-picking of locally tested patches. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net