From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 12:29:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB87716A40F; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:29:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35F943D58; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:28:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (czgzuv@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kAMCT6e3023868; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:29:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id kAMCT5h3023867; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:29:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:29:05 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200611221229.kAMCT5h3023867@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Ron.Wingfield@Archaxis.net, nschweers@gmx.de, bmah@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <45635D0B.2010005@freebsd.org> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:29:12 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: kernel compile fails with error 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, Ron.Wingfield@Archaxis.net, nschweers@gmx.de, bmah@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:29:18 -0000 Bruce A. Mah wrote: > Ron Wingfield wrote: > > (Mr. Schweers, this is not directed to you.) > > > > I'm not offering any comment or suggestion regarding Mr. Schweers problem . > > . .but from his previously posted make-output regarding the following, is > > the "Stop in" message literally as copied by Mr. Schweers? If so, then have > > the developers sunk to the level that such coded error message reporting > > resorts to such offensive language? > > The "offensive language" is, apparently, the name that the original > poster chose to call his kernel configuration. The build system is just > reporting the directory name it was given. For what it's worth, "BRAINFUCK" is the name of a programming language, well-known for it's extreme minimalism. While it is not very useful for real-world applications, it was (is?) somewhat popular among CS students because of the challenging nature of implementing seemingly trivial tasks with it. Other such languages include INTERCAL (the only language that has a "comefrom" instruction instead of "goto") and BEFUNGE, a language that uses a two-dimensional command structure. I think there's nothing wrong with using names of programming languagess for host names and/or kernel names. Best regards Oliver PS: Some links for those interested ... BRAINFUCK: http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/bf/ INTERCAL: http://catb.org/~esr/intercal/ BEFUNGE: http://catseye.webhop.net/projects/befunge93/ PPS: Replies should go to -chat, not -stable. Thanks. -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "The ITU has offered the IETF formal alignment with its corresponding technology, Penguins, but that won't fly." -- RFC 2549