From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 8 17:40:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F7016A4DE for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:40:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9589D43D45 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:40:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 5474 invoked by uid 399); 8 Aug 2006 17:40:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Aug 2006 17:40:24 -0000 Message-ID: <44D8CC84.9010202@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 10:40:20 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060729) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <14817321@bsam.ru> <20060807183724.GA47899@xor.obsecurity.org> <16560673@bsam.ru> <20060807201203.GA84762@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <50488990@bsam.ru> <1154984178.95608.6.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20060807210603.GA85637@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <1154985655.95608.8.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20060807235205.6d95f549@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20060807235205.6d95f549@Magellan.Leidinger.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Brooks Davis , Boris Samorodov , pav@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: extract both bz2 and gz files from distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 17:40:30 -0000 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Pav Lucistnik (Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:20:55 +0200): > >> So you prefer imposing yet another dependency on the user is less evil >> than adding few lines of extra code in port Makefile? >> >> Interesting PoV. > > We're talking about 4.x. It's on the way out. So it's about increased > complexity (own do-extract target) on the well supported systems, or > about another dependency on the old and "we support it if it isn't a > hassle" versions. For the linux ports Boris is needing this part, I > vote for another dependency (like we have already with USE_GCC in other > ports). FWIW, I agree with Brooks and Pav here, and that's speaking as someone who still actively maintains his ports on RELENG_4 (although I'm looking forward to not having to do so). Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection