From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 5 22:40:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC0B106567A for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E32F8FC14 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o85Me4Sr000223 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o85Me3sP000222; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:40:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:40:03 GMT Message-Id: <201009052240.o85Me3sP000222@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Alexander Best Cc: Subject: Re: bin/150262: truss(1) -f doesn't follow descendants of the linux process X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexander Best List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:40:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/150262; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexander Best To: bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/150262: truss(1) -f doesn't follow descendants of the linux process Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:31:01 +0000 i'm not sure truss is supposed to work with linux binaries. you might want to consider using ktrace and linux_kdump. the point however is: should truss work with linux binaries or not? if it's not designed to do so it might be best to abort execution of truss of it has been invoked with a linux binary. opinions? cheers. alex -- a13x