Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 10:36:19 -0800 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mysterious reboots Message-ID: <199601301836.KAA01413@Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 30 Jan 1996 09:46:25 MST." <199601301646.JAA12072@rocky.sri.MT.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>David Greenman writes: >> >We have a problem with two 2.1.0-RELEASE machines. One is a P5-100 with >> >> If it is possible, please upgrade to 2.1-stable. -stable contains code >> to detect stack overflows and panic more gracefully. It also has several >> important bugfixes which may or may not help your specific problem. > >Is there anything stopping us from creating a patch from 2.1R to >2.1-stable as of today? It certainly would make it easier for a lot of >folks to get the new code, and also improve our public relations. There is nothing stopping us from doing that, but such a patch would change daily and I don't think we should be in the business of maintaining it when SUP is available for this purpose. >This leads me to this question. Is there anyway of getting the 2.1R >bits from CVS? We're using the release tag for follow on code, so can >we get back to the actual code used in the release? (I suppose we could >specify a date, but I'm not sure what exact date the tree was burned >from.) RELENG_2_1_0_RELEASE -DG David Greenman Core Team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601301836.KAA01413>